The Review Tribunal reviews the information involved in an appeal and makes a decision on whether or not a person should receive the benefits for which they applied. The Review Tribunal is an independent and impartial body that will take an entirely new look at your case. It does not act on behalf of the Appellant, the Minister of HRSDC or any other party to the appeal.
The Review Tribunal consists of three persons: a Chairperson, who is always a lawyer, and two other members (see Composition of a Review Tribunal).
The main purpose of a Review Tribunal is to hold a hearing and decide an appeal. To make its decision, the Review Tribunal will carefully and impartially consider all of the information provided by the Appellant, HRSDC's representative and any other parties to the appeal, whether or not that information was available at earlier stages of decision-making.
The Canada Pension Plan Regulations set out some of the ground rules for the way in which Review Tribunals carry out their responsibilities. Review Tribunals are also guided by common law principles of procedural fairness. These principles apply to the procedures followed by Review Tribunals, rather than the substance of their decisions. (Review Tribunals must apply the law as written; they have no discretion to change or ignore the CPP or OAS legislation.) Generally speaking, the key principles of procedural fairness that relate to Review Tribunals include:
Review Tribunals are also guided by the OCRT's Mission Statement and Code of Conduct.
A Review Tribunal can only apply the Canada Pension Plan or Old Age Security legislation and make a decision based on the facts of your particular case. The Review Tribunal is not bound by the guidelines and policies of HRSDC.
The powers of Review Tribunals are set out in the two Acts under which appeals can be made. A Review Tribunal can confirm or vary a decision of the Minister of HRSDC made under section 81 or subsection 84 of the Canada Pension Plan or under subsection 27.1(2) of the Old Age Security Act.
Under subsection 84 (1) of the Canada Pension Plan, these powers include:
Authority to determine questions of law and fact
84 (1) A Review Tribunal and the Pension Appeals Board have authority to determine any question of law or fact as to
and the decision of a Review Tribunal, except as provided in this Act, or the decision of the Pension Appeals Board, except for judicial review under the Federal Courts Act, as the case may be, is final and binding for all purposes of this Act.
(2) The Minister, a Review Tribunal or the Pension Appeals Board may, notwithstanding subsection (1), on new facts, rescind or amend a decision under this Act given by him, the Tribunal or the Board, as the case may be.
A Review Tribunal can:
A Review Tribunal cannot:
A Review Tribunal can:
A Review Tribunal cannot:
A Review Tribunal is made up of three Panel Members chosen by the Commissioner of Review Tribunals. There are three categories of Panel Members: Legal, Medical and Community.
A Review Tribunal includes a Chairperson, who is always a lawyer and a member of the bar of a province, and two other members. If the appeal involves a CPP disability benefit, at least one of the other two members must be a qualified health care professional from the Medical category. Members in the Community category are not required to have medical or legal expertise, however they have a rich and diverse background in community service.
In the case of appeals involving issues under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it is the practice of the Commissioner to include at least two lawyers on the Review Tribunal.